Canning Methods That Are Not Safe

Bernardin's position is that there are no safe short-cuts in home canning, and that heat processing high-acid foods in a boiling water canner and low-acid foods in a pressure canner, for the appropriate time for the food and jar size, are the only currently approved methods for safe home canning. Everything else on this page is a method they name specifically as faulty, unsafe or potentially dangerous. Those are canning with rubber rings and glass lids, sealing with paraffin wax, open-kettle canning, oven canning, steam canning, microwave canning, using a vacuum sealing device instead of heat processing, and inverting or wrapping jars in blankets to make them seal. Recipes published before 1988 predate the current guidelines and may carry those methods. If you have jars on a shelf that were processed by any of these methods, they were never heat processed to a tested time, and the safe course is to discard them without tasting.

There are no safe short-cuts in home canning. That is Bernardin’s own sentence, and the rest of it draws the line this page is about:

Heat processing all high acid foods in a boiling water canner and low acid foods in a pressure canner — for the appropriate time for the food and jar size — are the only currently approved methods for safe home canning.

Two methods are approved. Everything below is one Bernardin names as faulty, unsafe or potentially dangerous. If you have already put food up by one of them, skip to what to do with those jars.

Corrected 19 September 2026: this page told you to clean up after a suspect jar with a bleach solution — in the disposal list and again in the FAQ. No source we hold publishes a disinfectant for that surface. HealthLink BC’s disposal steps name no disinfectant: hands with warm soapy water, then wash every utensil and surface. Their file is unreachable from our tooling today (HTTP 000), so this follows the wording this site already carries on forty other pages from an earlier read of it. Québec’s home-canning page, which we also cite, contains no mention of bleach or chlorine at all. Nothing about bagging, binning or keeping the jar sealed has changed.

The eight, at a glance

MethodWhat it looks likeWhy it is on the list
Open-kettleCook in a pot, ladle hot into jars, lid on, wait for the pingThe filled jars are never heated to and held at the temperature that destroys spoilage organisms
Oven canningFilled jars baked in the oven instead of a cannerJars can break or explode; dry heat penetrates the jar slowly and the food is not heated sufficiently
Steam canningJars on a rack in a shallow covered pan of boiling waterThe steam is not pressurized, the temperature is uneven, and no safe processing times exist for it
Microwave canningDevices marketed for canning in a microwaveNot shown to destroy all bacteria present, and they do not heat uniformly
Vacuum sealingA sealer attachment pulling a vacuum on a mason jarNo heat treatment at all, so organisms can grow under the vacuum seal
Paraffin waxMelted wax poured over jam or jelly instead of a lidThe wax shrinks and pinholes; mould follows, and mould can mean mycotoxins
Inverting or blanketingTurning jars upside down, or wrapping them to cool slowlyRarely reaches a temperature that destroys microorganisms, and the warm spell can promote growth
Rubber rings and glass lidsWire-bail jars, zinc caps, flat rubber ringsFailure rate too high to be recommended for home canning today

Why “it has always worked” is not the test

This is the objection worth answering first, because it is usually the true one. Somebody’s grandmother sealed jam under wax for forty years and nobody ever got sick.

Bernardin answers it directly, and their phrasing is better than any paraphrase:

Some people may experience “good luck” with outdated methods…and then one year everything spoils! Each growing season is different. Heat-resistant bacteria are not necessarily present in every piece of produce. IF these organisms are absent…and that’s a big IF…under-processed foods might keep. When they are present, the food spoils.

Their instruction from there is one line: always assume these microorganisms are present.

That is why every entry above is written as a rule about the method rather than a judgement about your jar. The method does not become safe because a particular batch survived; the batch survived because that year’s tomatoes happened not to carry the organism.

Open-kettle canning

The commonest of the eight, and the one most likely to be in a handwritten family recipe. You cook the food in an open saucepan, ladle it hot into jars, and put the lids straight on, hoping the seal forms as it cools.

Bernardin: “Open-kettle canning is not safe and is not recommended for food preservation.” Their reason is that regardless of how long or how hard you cooked it in the pot, the filled jars are never heated to and held at the temperatures that destroy spoilage microorganisms, and the step that drives air out of the jar to form a real vacuum is missing entirely.

What that produces is a lid that looks right. It may curve downward, sit there for months, and then unseal — or not unseal, and simply be a low-vacuum jar of under-processed food.

Simply getting lids to curve downward on jars will not, in itself, prevent food from spoiling.

Oven canning

Bernardin is blunter about this one than about anything else on the list: “Not only is it unsafe, oven-canning can be extremely hazardous.”

Two separate problems. Jars can break or explode from the temperature swing when the oven door opens — that is a burn and a face full of glass, not a food-safety question. And dry heat penetrates a jar of food very slowly, so the contents never get hot enough for long enough. Oven temperature also varies with the accuracy of the regulator and how heat circulates in that particular oven, which is the opposite of the controlled, known temperature a process time assumes.

Bernardin lists oven sterilisation of empty jars separately, as a cause of thermal shock and breakage. Jars are sterilised in water, not in the oven.

Steam canning

Worth separating carefully, because the name misleads. A steam canner is a shallow covered pan: jars sit on a rack, water boils underneath, steam circulates. It is not a pressure canner and shares nothing with one but the word.

Do not confuse steam canning with pressure canning… Steam in this device is not pressurized.

Unpressurised steam sits at the boiling point, so it cannot reach the 116 °C that Québec names as the safe temperature only a pressure canner can reach — the whole point of a pressure canner. Bernardin adds that these devices do not create a steady flow of steam nor hold an even temperature, so “it is impossible to know if the heat has penetrated the food properly.”

And the practical instruction, which is the one that matters: the processing times in tested recipes are for a boiling water canner or a pressure canner. Do not apply them to a steam canner — safe times have not been established for it.

Microwave canning

Devices have been sold for this. Bernardin’s answer is four words long at the end: “Do not use these devices to can food at home.”

Their objections are that the devices have not been shown to destroy all the bacteria present, that they do not heat uniformly, and that food siphoning out of the jars and lid failures both occur.

Vacuum sealing instead of processing

This one catches careful people, because the appliance genuinely does what it claims. A jar attachment on a vacuum sealer really will pull a vacuum on a mason jar.

The vacuum is not the preservation. Bernardin:

Since there is no heat treatment to destroy spoilage microorganisms and botulism bacteria, these organisms can grow under the vacuum seal.

An anaerobic sealed jar at room temperature is not a neutral container — it is the exact environment Clostridium botulinum prefers. Public Health Ontario’s review lists the growth envelope as a pH above 4.6, less than 2% oxygen, 4–50 °C, and water activity above 0.85. A vacuum-sealed jar of low-acid food on a shelf satisfies every one of them.

Bernardin’s own recommendation for the attachment: dry ingredients and non-perishable staples only. Flour, rice, dried beans, coffee, dehydrated food. Nothing wet, nothing destined for the pantry shelf as a preserve.

Paraffin wax

Still sold, still in old jam recipes, and off the list for two reasons that compound.

First, the seal fails in ways you cannot see. Melted paraffin covers the surface and reaches the jar rim, then shrinks away from the glass as it hardens, letting air at the food. Even where it looks solid it can carry microscopic pinholes.

Second — and this is the part that surprises people — you cannot skim the mould off. Bernardin:

Research has shown that mold growth may produce mycotoxins, that can be very harmful to human health. Mycotoxins can migrate like invisible threads through the food to the bottom of the jar. Thus, skimming the surface mold will not remove mycotoxins.

That sentence is why mould on home-canned food is a discard and never a rescue, wax or no wax.

Inverting jars, and wrapping them in blankets

Two versions of the same idea: use the food’s own heat to do the processing. Turn the filled jars upside down for a few minutes so the hot contents sterilise the lid, or wrap the hot jars in towels so they cool slowly.

Bernardin’s finding is that food preserved this way “rarely, if ever, reaches temperatures sufficient to destroy microorganisms.” And the blanket version is worse than merely ineffective:

Keeping the jars warm in blankets can, in fact, be dangerous. The prolonged warm environment may promote bacterial growth inside the jars.

Slow cooling is not gentle processing. It is time spent in the temperature range where bacteria grow.

Rubber rings, glass lids, wire bails and zinc caps

The antique jars — wire-bail with a glass lid and a flat rubber ring, or one-piece zinc porcelain-lined caps. Bernardin does not recommend them for home canning today, on the grounds of failure rate.

They are lovely, and they are excellent for dry storage, refrigerator pickles and cut flowers. They are not for heat processing. The two-piece SNAP lid exists because it vents during processing and then holds a measurable vacuum — a rubber ring does neither predictably.

Recipes published before 1988

Not a method, but the reason most of these methods are still circulating.

General home canning guidelines were updated in the late 1980s to meet today’s standards of quality and safety. Home canning recipes or books published prior to 1988 may contain outdated information which could affect the safety of the end result.

Bernardin’s own line draws it at 1988, so that is where we draw it too. A pre-1988 book is not automatically wrong about everything, but it is exactly where paraffin, open-kettle and oven canning are still written down as normal — and it may carry processing times set for equipment and lids that no longer exist.

Corrected 19 September 2026: this page gave the boundary as 1989 in four places, while the Bernardin sentence quoted directly above it says books published prior to 1988. The year is theirs and ours was a year wider. If you set aside a 1988 book on our figure, Bernardin’s own line does not put it in the warned set — though a book from either side of the boundary is still worth checking against a current edition, because that is when the guidelines moved.

This applies hardest to a handwritten card. A recipe copied from a relative has no publication date at all, so the method it names is the only clue you have.

What we are not going to tell you

We cannot tell you that a particular jar made this way has gone bad. That is not the standard, and it is not knowable by looking. The botulinum toxin is odourless and tasteless; it does not cloud the food, and a jar can be dangerous and look perfect.

What we can tell you is what the authority publishes: these methods were not tested, no processing time exists for them, and the barrier a shelf-stable jar depends on was never established. That settles it without anyone needing to inspect anything.

What to do with jars you already made this way

Treat them as food that was never processed and has been sitting at room temperature.

  1. Do not taste it, and do not taste it to check. There is no amount small enough to be a test.
  2. Do not open the jar if you can avoid it. Keep it sealed.
  3. Bag it. Put the unopened jar inside a heavy garbage bag, seal it, then put that inside a second waterproof container with a lid.
  4. Bin it in a covered rubbish bin that your household, children and pets cannot get into.
  5. Clean up. Wash your hands well with warm soapy water, and wash every utensil and surface the jar or your hands may have touched — HealthLink BC’s steps, which name no disinfectant.

How to tell if home-canned food has gone bad carries the full disposal routine, including what to do if a jar has already leaked.

If food from a jar like this has already been eaten, do not wait to see whether it passes. Double or blurred vision, drooping eyelids, slurred speech, difficulty swallowing, a dry mouth or muscle weakness — call 911 or go to an emergency department immediately. Botulism antitoxin works best given early.

The two methods that are approved

For completeness, since the whole page is defined against them:

  • Water-bath canning — high-acid foods only: jams, jellies, fruit, pickles, and tomatoes with added acid. A boiling water canner is a large deep pot with a lid and a rack. Bernardin’s Complete Book asks for a pot 7.5 cm (3 in) taller than the jars (p.10); the water itself goes 2.5 cm over the lids (p.7), which is the floor of the 1–2 inch range their website gives.
  • Pressure canning — the only safe method for low-acid food: vegetables, meat, poultry, seafood, soup. It reaches 116 °C; a boiling water canner cannot.
A pressure canner and a pressure cooker, compared A line drawing of two vessels side by side. The pressure canner is the taller: it carries a dial gauge and a vent pipe with a weighted regulator on its lid, three jars stand upright on a rack inside it, and the water sits shallow around the base of the jars rather than over them. The pressure cooker is short enough that its whole lid falls at about the height of the canner’s jar tops; it has a small pressure indicator pin in place of a dial, a sealing valve in place of an open vent pipe, and a small trivet in place of a canning rack. Pressure canner 1 2 3 4 Pressure cooker 1 2 3 4

This diagram shows the equipment, not the method. It is here to help you tell a pressure canner from a pressure cooker. Water depth, processing times and pressures come from your tested recipe and your canner’s manual — not from this drawing.

  1. 1. The gauge. A canner has to reach and hold a stated pressure, so it carries a dial that measures the internal pressure, a weighted regulator that jiggles at 5, 10 or 15 lb, or both. Bernardin publishes a separate altitude table for each type, so the gauge you own decides which table you follow. Drawn on the cooker: a pressure indicator pin, which tells you the vessel is under pressure and not what pressure it is at.
  2. 2. The vent pipe. Left open at the start, with steam exhausted through it for 10 minutes before the pressure is brought up. That purges the air which would otherwise lower the temperature the jars actually reach. Drawn on the cooker: a sealing valve, which closes the vessel rather than venting it.
  3. 3. The rack. A canning rack holds the jars off the base so water circulates underneath them and the glass never sits on direct heat. Drawn on the cooker: a trivet, which is there to lift food clear of the liquid.
  4. 4. The size. A canner is built around the jar — tall enough that filled jars stand upright with the lid locked, and wide enough to hold a batch of them. The dashed line marks where the drawn cooker’s rim falls against that.

A cooker may share some of these parts, and that is the trap. The reason it is not a substitute is not the hardware. Bernardin’s published position is that heat processing high-acid foods in a boiling water canner and low-acid foods in a pressure canner are the only currently approved methods for safe home canning — and their tested processing times were established in those two vessels. There is no tested time to apply to any other appliance.

You do not need to buy a purpose-made canner to do the first one properly — see water-bath canning without a canner, which is Bernardin’s own tip rather than a workaround.

Altitude adjustment

Process times in a boiling-water canner are written for altitudes up to 305 m. Above that, water boils below 100 °C and the time printed in the recipe is no longer enough. Find your elevation, then add the minutes Bernardin publishes for that band.

Elevation (m) Elevation (ft) Add to processing time
0 – 305 0 – 1,000 None — use the recipe time as written
306 – 915 1,001 – 3,000 +5 minutes
916 – 1,830 3,001 – 6,000 +10 minutes
1,831 – 2,440 6,001 – 8,000 +15 minutes
2,441 – 3,050 8,000 – 10,000 +20 minutes

On the line between two bands, round up to the higher one. Slightly over-processing is safe; under-processing is not.

Bernardin’s published tables stop at 3,050 m.

Find your Canadian city · Full altitude guide

Figures from Bernardin, “How do I can at a high altitude?” (bernardin.ca). Confirm against your own Bernardin edition before you start — a book edition and the website can differ.

Frequently asked questions

Why does a method that worked for my grandmother count as unsafe?

Because working once is not the same as being reliable, and Bernardin says so in as many words: some people may experience good luck with outdated methods, and then one year everything spoils. Each growing season is different and heat-resistant organisms are not present in every piece of produce. If they are absent — and that is a big if — an under-processed jar might keep. Their instruction is to always assume the organisms are present. General home canning guidelines were updated in the late 1980s, so a book or recipe published before 1988 may carry a method that is no longer considered safe.

Can I use an electric pressure cooker or multicooker to can?

Not for shelf-stable canning. Bernardin's sentence is that heat processing high-acid foods in a boiling water canner and low-acid foods in a pressure canner are the only currently approved methods for safe home canning, and an electric multicooker is neither of those. That is a published position rather than our inference, and it is the same reasoning that rules out the microwave devices they name specifically. Bernardin's tested processing times were established for a boiling water canner or a pressure canner; there is no tested time to apply to any other appliance.

I inverted my jam jars and they sealed. Isn't that proof?

No. A lid curving downward is not proof of a heat process. Bernardin's own wording is that simply getting lids to curve downward on jars will not, in itself, prevent food from spoiling — a seal formed from residual heat can be a low vacuum that fails later on the shelf. They go further on the blanket version: food kept warm in blankets rarely, if ever, reaches temperatures sufficient to destroy microorganisms, and the prolonged warm environment may promote bacterial growth inside the jars.

What is wrong with a steam canner? It uses steam like a pressure canner.

Bernardin's first line on this is do not confuse steam canning with pressure canning. The steam in a shallow steam canner is not pressurized, so it never reaches the 116 °C that Québec names as the safe temperature only a pressure canner can reach. Bernardin's stated objection is that these canners do not create a steady flow of steam nor maintain an even temperature, so it is impossible to know if the heat has penetrated the food properly, and that safe processing times have not been established for the method.

Can I scrape the mould off a paraffin-sealed jelly?

No, and this is the part most people have not heard. Bernardin states that mould growth may produce mycotoxins, that these can migrate like invisible threads through the food to the bottom of the jar, and that skimming the surface mould will not remove them. Paraffin shrinks away from the glass as it hardens and can carry microscopic pinholes, so air reaches the food either way. A mouldy jar is discarded, not rescued.

Is a vacuum sealer attachment for mason jars safe to use?

For dry goods, yes. For canning, no. Bernardin's wording is that since there is no heat treatment to destroy spoilage microorganisms and botulism bacteria, these organisms can grow under the vacuum seal, and that vacuum sealing devices are not safe substitutes for proper heat processing. Their own recommendation is to use them with canning jars only for dry ingredients and non-perishable staples — flour, rice, dried beans, coffee.

What do I do with jars I already made this way?

Treat them as unprocessed food that has been at room temperature. Do not taste them to decide — the botulinum toxin is odourless and tasteless, so tasting tells you nothing and risks everything. Seal each jar unopened inside a heavy garbage bag, then inside a second waterproof container, and put it in a covered rubbish bin your household and pets cannot reach. Wash your hands well with warm soapy water, and wash every utensil and surface the jar or your hands may have touched. Our page on telling if home-canned food has gone bad has the full disposal routine.

Sources

  • Bernardin Home Canning — Home canning FAQ (https://www.bernardin.ca/en/how-to-can/faq.htm)
  • HealthLink BC — Home canning: How to avoid botulism, File #22 (https://www.healthlinkbc.ca/healthlinkbc-files/home-canning-how-avoid-botulism)
  • Québec — Home canning: Preparation and prevention (https://www.quebec.ca/en/health/nutrition/food-safety-risk-prevention/food-safety/preparing-cooking-food-safely/home-canning)
  • Public Health Ontario — Home canning: literature review, 2014 (https://www.publichealthontario.ca/-/media/documents/h/2014/home-canning.pdf)